Virtual Physical Prehabilitation in Lung Transplant Candidates: A Proof-of-Concept Study.

This study aimed to preliminary test the effectiveness of 12-week virtual physical prehabilitation program followed by a maintenance phase. The main objective was to estimate the extent to which it affects exercise capacity, frailty, lower limb strength and health-related quality of life (HRQOL) in lung transplant candidates. The program offered supervised strengthening exercises, independent aerobic exercises and weekly phone calls (maintenance phase). Primary outcome was the six-minute walk distance (6MWD). Secondary outcomes: the Short Physical Performance Battery (SPPB), five-times sit-to-stand test (5STS), the St George's Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ) for HRQOL. Twenty patients were included (mean age 57.9; 6 women/14 men); fourteen completed the prehabilitation program and 5 completed the maintenance phase. There was no statistically significant improvement in 6MWD, SPPB or SGRQ after the 12-week program. Most patients either maintained or improved the 6MWT and SPPB scores. There was a significant improvement in the 5STS. After the maintenance phase, most patients either improved or maintained their scores in all outcomes except for the sub-score of symptoms in the SGRQ. A 12-week virtual physical prehabilitation program with a 12-week maintenance phase can help lung transplant candidates improve or maintain their physical function while waiting for transplantation.

Establishing patient-partner priorities within the primary and integrated health care innovations network in Canada.

Background: Many experienced primary care researchers have seen the benefits of meaningful engagement with patients and community members in their research, elevating them to a research partner status. The research questions and agendas, however, are often initiated and determined by the researchers. Increasingly, research teams, organizations and networks actively engage with patient-partners to better understand what their research priorities would look like, bringing patient-partners into the research process much earlier. Among many other initiatives within the Strategy for Patient Oriented Research program, a Primary and Integrated Health Care Innovations Network (PIHCIN) was established in Canada, which includes 11 geographically distributed research networks. As part of PIHCIN, a Pan-Canadian Patient Council (the Council) was established with representatives from each provincial site. To ensure their voices were being heard, the Council decided to establish their own research priorities for consideration by the PIHCI network. Objective: To establish patient-partner priorities in the Canadian primary health care context Methods: The main goal of the Council was to submit research priorities to identify what was important from a patient-partner perspective. Through consensus building and prioritization voting, the Council developed and presented a draft of their research priorities to the PIHCI Network Leadership Council. In a second step, the Council decided that the process was missing from the document. Subsequently, with the use of the SMART goal framework, the Council engaged in a process to establish how research priorities could be accomplished. Results: The initial research priorities comprised 11 items, including priorities concerning patient's access to data, integrated health teams, patient initiated collaborative research, virtual care, broader definition of health, etc. The initial priorities eventually evolved into a set of principles, strategic operating goals, and finalized research priorities. Conclusion: Through an iterative process, the Council was able to lead, initiate and differentiate strategic operating goals from the research priorities. This process and results can provide insight for developing critical input from patient-partners for primary health care research.

Demonstrating the complexity of patient-partnered research in primary care: a snapshot of patient-partners.

Background: In Canada, we are still struggling to achieve the critical goal of enabling performant health care systems that moves research results to real-world impact particularly for primary care. To address this, we have created a primary care research network where patient partners are involved in all levels of decision making for governance, research, and innovation. For many researchers, however, it is unclear what primary care patient-partners 'brings to the table.' As the Pan-Canadian Patient Council of the Primary and Integrated Health Care Innovations Network, we wanted to provide insight into the richness of expertise and experience patient partners contribute. Objectives: To provide an example of the characteristics, history and lived experience that patient-partners in a primary care research network represent and demonstrate the resource this presents. Methods: As current council members, representing 10 provinces, we developed a survey of our demographics, personal history and experience in patient-oriented research using iterative, collaborative meetings. The answers to the questions provided "snapshots" for each of us. As a group, we worked with researchers to descriptively and thematically analyze the responses to provide insight and a description of primary care research patient partners. Results: With 2 men and 8 women, we represented an average of 42.5 years of experience with health conditions (range 10-84 years) including cancer, genetic conditions, and multiple chronic diseases. On average, we worked with 4.7 different organizations each (range 2-9) on research topics covering the spectrum of primary care. Many of us acted as mentors for researchers and trainees. All of us were innovators and influencers with demonstrated leadership skills. A need for more diversity in terms of age and underrepresented minorities was noted. Conclusion: Diversity of life experience, extensive exposure to the health care system and strong engagement with multiple organizations for primary care research characterized us as patient-partners. This lived expertise represents a significant asset for researchers. This work should encourage researchers to starting thinking about how to include primary care patient-partners as a crucial resource in health research.

Changes in 6-minute walking distance in lung transplant candidates while participating in a home-based pre-habilitation program-A retrospective chart review.

Home-based exercise programs may offer a less costly alternative to providing exercise pre-transplant to a large number of patients. We describe the changes in 6-minute walk distance (6MWD) in lung transplant candidates who participated in a home-based exercise program and their relationship to post-transplant outcomes. Retrospectively, we investigated 159 individuals while awaiting transplantation who performed the surgery between 2011 and 2015. Primary outcome was 6MWD at time of assessment for transplant, last test prior to transplant and one-month post-transplant. 6MWD decreased by 28 ± 93.9 m between the time of assessment and the last 6MWD prior to transplantation (P < .001). Forty-one patients (25.8%) increased their 6MWD (mean + 85.8 ± 42.8 m); 72 patients (45.3%) decreased their 6MWD (mean -109.8 ± 71.2 m); and 46 patients (28.9%) had no change in 6MWD (-1.5 ± 15.7 m). There was a moderate correlation (r = .528; P < .001) between the last 6MWD prior to transplant and 6MWD post-transplant. Change in 6MWD prior to transplant weakly correlated with length of time on mechanical ventilation (r = -.185; P = .034). When adjusted for covariates, change in 6MWD prior to transplant was not associated with length of time on mechanical ventilation, total hospital LOS, or intensive care unit LOS. The majority of the patients were able to either increase or maintain their 6MWD while participating in a home-based pre-habilitation program during the waiting list period. Prospective research is needed to evaluate the effects of home-based pre-habilitation program for lung candidates.